About Author

James Mace

James Mace
  • Genre:

    Historical Fiction History
  • Country: United States
  • Books: 4
  • Profession: Author and Historian
  • Born: 14 May
  • Member Since: Aug 2017
  • Profile Views: 26,456
  • Followers: 18
  • VISIT AUTHOR: Website, Facebook, Twitter, Goodreads, Amazon, Linkedin,
BIOGRAPHY

I am a life-long historian and the author of twenty books, including seven Ancient History best-sellers, and two South African History best-sellers. I wrote the initial draft of his first novel, "Soldier of Rome: The Legionary", as a cathartic means of escapism while serving with the U.S. Army in Iraq from 2004 to 2005. My works span numerous eras, from Ancient Rome to the British Empire.

James Mace's Books

Stay in the loop on books by James Mace. See upcoming and best-selling books by the author here. You'll also find the deals on books by James Mace.
** Please note that the information or price displayed here may not be the updated. Make sure to double-check the latest book price before buying books.
** Also, there might be other books by James Mace not listed on AllAuthor.

Book
Crucible of Honour: The Battle of Rorke's Drift (The Anglo-Zulu War Book 2)
$7.25 kindleeBook,
Crucible of Honour: The Battle of Rorke's Drift (The Anglo-Zulu War Book 2)by James MacePublish: Jul 28, 2017Series: The Anglo-Zulu WarHistory
Brutal Valour: The Tragedy of Isandlwana (The Anglo-Zulu War Book 1)
$4.99 kindleeBook,
Brutal Valour: The Tragedy of Isandlwana (The Anglo-Zulu War Book 1)by James MacePublish: Aug 01, 2016Series: The Anglo-Zulu War
Die by the Blade
$4.49 kindleeBook,
Die by the Bladeby James MacePublish: Nov 30, 2017Historical Fiction
Slaves of Fear: A Land Unconquered
$2.99 kindleeBook,
Slaves of Fear: A Land Unconqueredby James MacePublish: Apr 24, 2016

James Mace's Series in Order

It's exciting to find a book series to follow! Discover the whole new world of book series created by James Mace.
** Also, there might be other book series by James Mace not listed on AllAuthor.

  • The Anglo-Zulu War

    1 Brutal Valour: The Tragedy of Isandlwana (The Anglo-Zulu War Book 1) - Published on Aug, 20162 Crucible of Honour: The Battle of Rorke's Drift (The Anglo-Zulu War Book 2) - Published on Jul, 2017

James Mace Interview On 12, Dec 2017

"In 2004, while serving with the U.S. Army in Iraq, James Mace took an opportunity to write. That's when he began to work on his first novel, Soldier of Rome: The Legionary, when not on missions. When James came home from Iraq at the end of 2005, he decided to self-publish the book after facing several usual rejections from literary agents. As the sales were minimal, he continued with the military career, while writing books on the side.
In 2011, James was introduced to the concept of e-books and kindle by a dear friend. Thanks to that, he started to make more in e-book royalties than he was working full-time for the Army Guard. In 2014, almost after 21 years of military career, James retired as a Master Sergeant to be a full-time author. And as they say, the rest is history, his experiences in the Army did help to lay the foundation of James' passion for writing."
Tell us a little about your hometown and life growing up?

I grew up just outside of Boise, Idaho, in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. My hometown of Meridian was much smaller then. In 1979, there were about 6,000 people in Meridian and 120,000 in Boise. Much has changed since then. Meridian itself now has close to 90,000 people, with the entire Boise valley at over half-a- million. I grew up in the 80s, and mine was a pretty typical childhood. My Dad was in the Air Force, but because he was in recruiting, we never lived on base, and only moved once, when I was three. So even though I was technically a ‘military brat’, I don’t consider myself one, because we never lived on a base, and did not live that lifestyle. My Mum worked for the school district, specialising in Special Education. I have one older sister, Angie. Our birthdays are two years apart, almost to the exact day. Clearly, our parents had great timing! We’ve always been close, and had a lot of the same friends growing up. In high school, we both had pretty typical teenager jobs at a pizza place, along with some of our friends. She’s now a certified nursing assistant (CNA), working in disabled care, and going back to school for her Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) certification. I have so much respect and admiration for her and what she does. During Junior High and High School, I competed in both football and wrestling. I also joined the school newspaper my senior year. Given what I would end up doing later in life, it’s surprising I did not take it up sooner. Drama and acting classes were among my favourites. To be honest, there are many days when I wish I had pursued that path. I was offered an internship at the Idaho Shakespeare Festival the summer after my senior year; however, I had already joined the military and was slated to depart for boot camp that July. What was your favourite cereal as a child?

I had a lot of them as a kid, though one that stands out is Cap’n Crunch. I once mentioned this to my wife. It’d been at least twenty-five years since I last ate it, so she went and picked me a up a box. While a great nostalgic treat, it almost put me into a sugar coma!

Do you think your experiences in the Army have helped your writing in any way?

I actually first enlisted in the Air Force in 1993, and was stationed in Phoenix, Arizona, at Luke Air Force Base until 1996. I then returned to Boise and joined the Army Guard as an M1A1 Tank Crewman. In addition to my weekend drills as a tanker, I also worked full-time on Gowen Field for the Army Guard as a logistics technician. In 2004, when I was a Staff Sergeant (E-6), our brigade was mobilised for Iraq. Most of us were not happy to learn that we would be leaving our tanks behind, and cross-training as infantrymen. Still, we made the most of it, as soldiers do. My unit was B Company, 2-116 th Cavalry. We spent the first couple months in theatre attached to the 1 st Infantry Division in Baquba, before joining the rest of our Brigade in Kirkuk. Our company was at a small patrol base, ‘away from the flagpole’, as it were, so we had a lot of autonomy. And despite the number of missions we conducted, we still had a lot of time on our hands. My routine for a year, when not on missions, was to eat, sleep, and hit the gym. I also saw an opportunity to begin writing. And so, it was while we were in Kirkuk that I started work on my first novel, Soldier of Rome: The Legionary. There was a story about a legionary fighting in Germania that had been in my head since I was about twelve, so I borrowed the laptop of one of my best friends, Don LaMott, and began putting the proverbial ‘pen to paper’. Funny thing, my parents were probably the least surprised that I took up writing. According to Mum, I’ve been telling stories since I was about six. I’ve also always had a love of history, especially Ancient Rome. By the time we came home from Iraq at the end of 2005, I had a completed draft, and even a couple chapters in what would become the sequel. As I pursued trying to publish, I dealt with all the usual rejections from literary agents (do those even exist anymore?). I finally decided to try supported self-publishing, though sales were minimal at best. I continued with my military career, while writing books on the side. In all honesty, my motivation revolved around telling stories that I would want to read. Then in early 2011, another dear friend, Martin Shepard—who sadly is no longer with us—owned a small print shop and publishing house. He showed me how easy it was to get my books onto Kindle. I honestly thought eBooks were a passing fad at the time, yet within a couple weeks, sales exploded. By spring, I was making more in book royalties than I was working full-time for the Army Guard. However, it was also taking me at least eighteen months to write each book. By that winter, I decided to take the plunge, resigning my day job, and dedicating myself to becoming a full-time author. I did remain with the Army Guard as a reservist, finishing out my career in 2014, after almost twenty-one years, retiring as a Master Sergeant (E-8). Without a doubt, my experiences in the Army helped build the foundation for my writing. I’ve been told many times that it is obvious I’m a veteran, due to the detail I go into regarding the subtle nuances and day-to- day grind for soldiers in the field. While I make every effort to keep my protagonists firmly grounded in their respective time periods / cultures, I have found that there are many inherent traits in soldiers that have changed very little over the millennia.

What is it about history that really intrigues you?

It’s only fair that I give credit to my parents, who got me into history at a young age. It was my Dad who introduced me to the Romans, and I was immediately enthralled. I first read the book, ‘I, Claudius’, when I was twelve, though I can’t remember if I read it before or after watching the Masterpiece Theatre production, starring Derek Jacobi. What intrigues me most is the people. I love reading actual stories about ordinary people who did extraordinary things. They weren’t superheroes or Jedi with magical powers. Those who achieved the greatest feats in history were often the most deeply flawed. Four of my personal heroes from history are Emperor Vespasian, the Duke of Wellington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Sir Winston Churchill. Each achieved great things, oftentimes in spite of their inherent faults. For example: Sir Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington is best known as the man who dealt Napoleon his final defeat at the Battle of Waterloo. He went on to become Prime Minister and later Constable of the Tower of London. To this day, he is larger-than-life; however, his many personal flaws were no secret during his lifetime. He was a notorious womaniser, who was prone to mistrust and micromanagement. And as much as he was loved as a military figure, he was despised as Prime Minister. His most famous nickname, The Iron Duke, had nothing to do with his military prowess. It actually came about in 1832, when he installed metal shutters on the windows of his home of Apsley House in London, following a series of riots. Despite his many faults, Wellington is still a legend. Until his passing in 1852, he was regarded as ‘The Greatest Living Briton’.

If you could time travel to any time period, when would you go to and why?

Though I view my passions for Ancient Rome and the British Empire equally, if given a time machine, I would probably visit England around the end of the Napoleonic Wars, when the Empire was approaching the height of its power. I would love to sit down to tea with the Duke of Wellington, just to hear insights from the man himself. I imagine I would either be filled with admiration, or find him insufferably pompous…perhaps a little of both.

In your book "Slaves of Fear: A Land Unconquered", are there any characters you added that aren't technically in the original tale?

Slaves of Fear is a stand-alone work; however, it does tie into the greater narrative that is The Artorian Chronicles. Because I write mostly about the soldiers in the ranks, who’ve been forgotten by history, most of my Roman characters are fictitious. In the absence of historical documentation, which becomes even more sparse the further one goes back in time, I utilise what I call the ‘Balance of Probability’ rule. If we don’t know exactly what happened, then I write what plausibly could have occurred. When writing a novel, as opposed to a history text book, one has more flexibility. I had to do this quite frequently during my Roman works, particularly Slaves of Fear. Historians such as Tacitus and Cassius Dio speak of the gradual conquest of Wales, yet they are sparse on details. I’ve visited Wales numerous times, and have walked much of the same ground that I write about. It often comes down to, if the primary sources are scant on detail, I survey the terrain and think to myself, “How would I do this?” I’ll then present my theories to other historians, asking their input on plausibility. I recall one such example while researching my book, Soldier of Rome: The Last Campaign. My girlfriend (who later became my wife) and I were visiting a dear friend, Bill Cainan, who is both a historian as well as a retired British Regimental Sergeant Major. We were standing atop the hill known as Maiden Castle (FYI: There’s no actual castle up there), which was besieged by Vespasian in 43 A.D. Tacitus states that the Romans broke the seemingly impenetrable stronghold in a day, but doesn’t say how. After walking the hill and surrounding area, I told Bill how I think Vespasian’s army took the hill. He replied, “Well that’s how I would do it.”

What are some rules or ethics concerned when it comes to writing historical events?

I believe it is wrong to insert modern morals into a time period when they would be completely unknown. For example, while slavery is utterly abhorrent, throughout most of human history it was accepted as the way things were. Though slavery was outlawed in England in 1772, and throughout the British Empire in 1833, final abolition in the ‘civilised’ world would not occur until 1865, at the end of the American Civil War. To the Ancient Romans, slavery was simply a part of life. Another example is the concept of sexual morality. Roman views were very liberal, especially when compared to the Victorian Era,or even by today’s standards. For example, adultery amongmarried couples was not considered adultery under two circumstances; if the act was committed with a slave, or if it was paid for. As patriarchal as their society was, this surprisingly applied to both men and women. If either husband or wife wished to ‘let off some steam’ in the local brothel, their spouse would not think anything of it. Most importantly of all, it is wrong to deliberately change known historical facts, simply to fit one’s preconceived narrative. I also loathe reading stories that are complete fantasy, yet they use historical persons. I’m not going to name names, but there is one series I read that had historical characters in the story more than a decade before they were even born. The climactic events were all utter fabrications that had no basis in actual history. When one does this, they are writing Historical Fantasy, not Historical Fiction. Unfortunately, most people are unaware of this, and so they take what they read at face value. To me, this completely violates the bond of trust which readers place in authors. Let’s be honest, most people have no desire to read history books, as they can be rather dry. This is why I write historical novels, to take the history and bring it to life for a modern audience. Many readers have stated that they never even knew about certain events until I wrote about them. To be fair, my own works are certainly not flawless. I do take pride in the level of realism and accuracy in my works, with any errors being completely unintentional. I’ve even gone back and revised some of my books, when it was later discovered that I had certain facts wrong. For example, in The Legionary I initially wrote that the Roman general, Germanicus Caesar, took the women and children prisoner, following the final siege. I later went back and revised this when I discovered that I had it wrong. Germanicus actually told his soldiers, “We’ve come to exterminate these people, not conquer them. Wipe them out.”

What made you decide to write the book "I Stood With Wellington"? If you were given the chance to play either Wellington or Napoleon in this story, who would you pick and why?

The British Empire is one of my favourite periods in history, and I have long held a fascination with the Napoleonic Wars. I was also getting a little burned out with writing about the legions, and needed a break. However, I wasn’t entirely certain that I could even write a non-Roman story, so I decided to first test the proverbial waters with a shorter novella. This became Forlorn Hope: The Storming of Badajoz, which later served as a prologue of sorts for some of the main cast in I Stood With Wellington. Forlorn Hope was very well-received by readers, and so I took the plunge. One added challenge was writing about a well-known historical event, the Battle of Waterloo. I felt a lot of added pressure; not only was Waterloo something most people are familiar with, countless books about it already exist. I therefore had the challenge of penning a story that would shed new light and perspective on the campaign, while also maintaining historical accuracy and keeping the reader captivated. Given the reception it received from reviewers, I feel I achieved that. As I stated above, the Duke of Wellington has long been one of my heroes. I even have a large canvas portrait of him hanging in our reading room. If given the chance to portray either him or Napoleon, I would choose Wellington without question. That said, as I conducted my research for this project, I began to empathise more and more with Napoleon. While I may not have agreed with many of Napoleon’s actions, I understood why he did them. Rather unexpectedly, both he and the French soldiers became sympathetic characters within the story. This led to me writing a follow-up about one of his greatest generals, Michel Ney, Marshal of France. Perhaps the most unique of all my works, Courage, Marshal Ney, is told mostly in flashback and from a perspective I never previously envisioned. Perhaps the greatest lesson I learned from this experience is that the key to good story-telling, especially when writing history, is to have characters on both sides that the reader can identify with. There doesn’t have to be a clearly defined hero or villain. In fact, I would go so far as to say it’s better not to. Present historical persons as they actually were, while making your fictitious characters plausible and believable, then let readers decide for themselves. As George R.R. Martin famously said in ‘A Song of Ice and Fire’ (aka Game of Thrones), “A villain is simply a hero of the other side.”

Between book 1 and book 2 in The Anglo-Zulu War series, which one took more time to write and why? What sort of meaning do these books hold to you?

The Anglo-Zulu War series is one massive project, divided into separate volumes. It is also quite possibly the singular work I have been most passionate about. Some who’ve read the first two books have said it was clear that I poured my heart and soul into these stories. One challenge that I took head-on was dispelling numerous myths about the battles of Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift, which have persisted in part due to the films, ‘Zulu’ and ‘Zulu Dawn’. While they are two of my all-time favourites, there are numerous flagrant historical errors. This is particularly true in ‘Zulu’, which told the story of the Battle of Rorke’s Drift, and also made Sir Michael Caine a star. Just a couple examples: Contrary to the film, Private Henry Hook was not a drunken malingerer, the Zulus were not using captured Martini-Henry rifles, and many of the historical characters were significantly younger than the actors who portrayed them. However, as one friend and fellow historian once told me, without the films, there would be no interest in the Anglo-Zulu War. And so, we owe them both a debt of gratitude. The first two books of this series, Brutal Valour and Crucible of Honour, tell the stories of Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift. My next challenge is taking the story beyond what we know from the films. Many don’t realise that Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift were simply the opening salvoes of the war. There were two other British columns that were advancing through Zululand, and their exploits will be covered in the next two volumes. Book Three, Lost Souls: The Forgotten Heroes of Eshowe, is rather aptly titled, as the British redcoats and Zulu warriors who fought the coastal campaign have been mostly forgotten. Though no one has ever made a film about them, this does not make their collective valour and sacrifice any less tragic or heroic. My hope is that one day the battlefields at Inyezane, Khambula, Ntombe, Hlobane, and Ulundi will hold the same level of reverence as the more famous battlefields of Isandlwana and Rorke’s Drift.

Hit us with some of your most interesting history facts!

These are completely random. And to be honest, one could write entire books of corrections to historical myths that we’ve too long taken as fact: - Contrary to films such as ‘Ben Hur’, oarsmen on Roman galleys were not slaves, but sailors within the imperial navy. Granted, their days were back-breaking and rather tedious, plus the pay was significantly less than that of a legionary. However, every man on an oar was there of his own volition. Each also kept a gladius (short sword) and small shield under his bench. During battle, when ships crashed together, they would arm themselves and head up to the top deck and join the fight. The very idea of having slaves as oarsmen on ancient warships is completely asinine, not to mention impractical. - The Roman Empire during the 1 st and 2 nd centuries had a total population of about 70 million, yet their military was surprisingly small. At the height of its power, during the reign of Emperor Trajan, there were thirty legions, each with about 5,000 total soldiers. Legionaries had to be Roman citizens and served for twenty years. There were an even greater number of auxiliaries; non-citizens who joined the army and were granted citizenship after twenty-five years. The entire Roman Army—legionaries and auxiliaries combined—numbered around 375,000 total soldiers, or 0.5% of the population. - Modern armies still model themselves around Rome. While there are certainly differences, organisational structures are still quite similar. Essentially, a legion is equal to a brigade, a battalion to a cohort, a century to a company, and a contiburnium to a squad. In terms of rank, a legate is similar to a brigadier or colonel, a centurion pilus prior to a lieutenant colonel, a centurion to a captain, an optio to a first sergeant / company sergeant major, and a decanus to a sergeant. And while the uniforms may have changed, a modern infantry company on parade looks almost identical to its Roman counterpart from 2,000 years ago. - Perhaps the most glaring contrast between film and reality is the age of soldiers. While almost every war film out there portrays them as ‘mature men’, the median age of combat soldiers since the Napoleonic Era is roughly twenty-two, with the highest percentage being around nineteen. Films from the 1960s were the worst offenders of this misrepresentation. Just watch ‘The Longest Day’, where the youngest cast members were about thirty. John Wayne was fifty-five when he portrayed Lieutenant Colonel Benjamin Vandervoot, who was in fact just twenty-seven at the time of Operation Overlord in 1944. On this note, I was rather dismayed when a film critic actually criticised the film, ‘Dunkirk’, for casting actors in their late teens to early twenties. The reviewer actually compared it unfavourably in this regard to ‘Saving Private Ryan’. While ‘Saving Private Ryan’ is arguably the best film ever made set during World War II, my one criticism is that the main cast were all way too old. At twenty-four, Giovanni Ribisi was the youngest; yet during World War II, he would have been an ‘old man’. Twenty-four was a far more realistic age for the platoon sergeant, who was instead portrayed by thirty-seven year old Tom Sizemore. That wars are fought mostly by ‘kids’, at the behest of old men, is a harsh reality which I believe still makes the general public uncomfortable. I think we should place the brutal facts out in the open, and lay off of casting actors in their thirties and forties to portray soldiers half their age.

Which book under the "Soldier of Rome" tag are you most proud of?

Of all the books bearing the ‘Soldier of Rome’ moniker, I would have to say that my two-part mini-series on the Year of the Four Emperors is what I’m most proud of. It was supposed to be a one- volume offshoot from my trilogy about the Great Jewish Revolt, which historically took place at the same time. The more I researched, not just the pair of civil wars that rocked the very foundations of Rome, but all the political intrigue and backstabbing (in some cases literally), the more I realised this story would be far longer and more complicated than first anticipated. When Soldier of Rome: Reign of the Tyrants reached 600 pages, with no end in sight, I knew I had to split it into two volumes. Otherwise, I would have to cut numerous important events, which would be compromising the very reason why I write historical novels in the first place. And so, I found a viable place to end the first volume, while titling the second, Soldier of Rome: Rise of the Flavians. At 510 and 512 pages respectively, they are my longest works to date. Brutal Valour: The Tragedy of Isandlwana came close, at 504 pages.

Between Josephus ben Matthias and Flavius Vespasian, who would you like to meet and talk to more?

Josephus and Vespasian are fascinating in their own rights. Their stories came together under the most unusual of circumstances, with each leading opposing armies during the Siege of Jotapata in 67 A.D. If given the choice of meeting one of them, my inherent bias would lead me to choose Vespasian. He is, in my opinion, one of the greatest men to ever become Emperor of Rome. However, I cannot help but be utterly intrigued by Josephus, who is one of the most controversial figures in Jewish history. Though Vespasian never lost a battle, by his own admission, Josephus came closest to besting him at Jotapata. Josephus not only survived after all the other leaders committed mutual suicide, he asserted that God came to him in a vision, stating that Vespasian would one day rule the world. Whether true, or simply the act of a desperate man trying to save his own life, his prophecy came true two years later. And with the moderate government in Jerusalem overthrown by fanatical zealots, who murdered his dear friend and mentor, Hanan ben Hanan, Josephus changed sides, becoming a Roman collaborator. Many view him as a traitor, while others as a pragmatist. I am personally in the later camp. The initial leaders of the Great Jewish Revolt were mostly moderates, who only rebelled after a long series of abuses from the Roman governors, and who wished for peace with the Empire. The zealots, on the other hand, were ruthless terrorists, who murdered their own people by the thousands, and who insisted on fighting to the death, long after any hopes of victory were crushed. During the Siege of Jerusalem, they held the people prisoner within the city, even as starvation and disease devastated the populace. Any who tried to escape and surrender to the Romans, including women and children, where killed as traitors. With that in mind, I cannot entirely blame Josephus for changing his allegiance, in what he hoped would bring an end the suffering of his people. He settled in Rome after the war, and later became a Roman citizen, taking on the name Flavius Josephus, in honour of his former enemies, who became his patrons. Love him or hate him, it is because of Josephus that we know so much about the history of the Jews. His twenty-volume histories, along with his works on the Great Jewish Revolt, are the most detailed accounts still in existence. While this may come as a surprise, given that Vespasian is one of my personal heroes, I would actually choose meeting Josephus.

Who is one really underrated historical character that you really love?

Emperor Tiberius. The second man to rule over the Roman Empire, he was a renowned military leader during his younger years. Yet despite his natural talents, he had a rather strained relationship with his stepfather, Augustus Caesar. Though he never wanted to be Emperor, he resented Augustus for selecting him essentially by default, after all other candidates died or were banished for bad behaviour. He was a very capable ruler, yet he possessed the worst personal disposition for it. His military skills were unparalleled, and he was both fiscally and administratively sound. The Empire flourished during his twenty-three- year reign; however, he had none of the charisma possessed by his predecessor. He was viewed as sullen and gloomy, with a dark disposition that alienated most of those closest to him. Something he never seemed to grasp was that being Emperor was as much about personality as it was ability. During his self-imposed exile to Capri, rumours abounded of sexual perversions and other vulgar acts, yet many modern historians dismiss these as nothing more than rumour; the equivalent to modern tabloids. I once summarised, “Tiberius was one of Rome’s greatest Emperors. Sadly, he had the personality of a shovel.”

Who are some other historical fiction authors that you love?

I consider Bernard Cornwell to be a master of the genre. He is able to take real and fictional characters, weaving them expertly into a story set against actual events. One of my favourite historical fiction characters is Richard Sharpe, from Cornwell’s series ‘Sharpe’s Rifles’, set during the Napoleonic Wars. These were made into an ITV series starring Sean Bean in the 1990s, and I own the entire set. The book, ‘Sharpe’s Company’, helped inspire my own work, Forlorn Hope, as both cover the Siege of Badajoz. A Sharpe-like character makes a brief appearance in my story, albeit he remains unnamed. He returns in I Stood With Wellington as a major, where he meets with a former colour sergeant who was just battlefield commissioned. As I had no idea how to contact Cornwell for permission to use Sharpe, he remains nameless. My character is simply an officer with the 95 th Rifles. He only has one short scene in each book, but anyone who’s read Sharpe knows who he was inspired by. Another author who directly inspired me was Michael Shaara, who wrote the novel, ‘The Killer Angels’, which was later used as the inspiration for the film, ‘Gettysburg’. Shaara once said that, though he was writing historical fiction, it was crucial that he be as historically accurate as possible. He also clarified that, once an author starts adding dialog and inner thoughts to characters is when the book technically becomes fiction. I took his words to heart, and have done my utmost to live by them when writing my own works.

Ask James Mace a Question

Have brimming questions to ask author James Mace? Ask whatever you like, but keep it appropriate.
** Please note that unanswered questions will not appear on the page. Refrain from posting promotional messages.

    • Error:

      Warning:

Contact James Mace

The author, a good book and you! Contact James Mace here.
** Please refrain from spamming and don’t bombard the author with promotional mails/messages. Your IP/Email address may be blocked if found doing so.

Contact Author on: Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin,

By using this form, you agree with the storage and handling of your data by AllAuthor.