Flavius Aetius is called “the last of the Romans,” while Ambrosius Aurelianus is remembered as Britain’s champion. Do you see them as heroic, tragic, or pragmatic leaders?
When myth and material evidence collide — mosaics, villas, fortifications — which do you find more compelling in shaping our understanding of the past?
Sites like Cadbury Castle and battles like Badon are layered with legend. Do you think these places should be read primarily as history, myth, or both?
This book is described as a “living work,” expanding with essays and illustrations. How do you feel about history books that evolve over time rather than staying fixed?