One of the most important realities of research is that it undergoes the authoritative legitimacy of ensuring credibility;this is in large part based on an implied consensus that sylogistical reasoning has a substantial relationship to facts but what process requires such a inclusive procedure? Is the test itself incompatible to the method employed, and if so the question verifies meaning in the activity rather than in the notable scientific and traditional demand. Do you think that researching meaning presents a conflict between the absence of behavior, and the impactful decisions that reflect engagement in discourse-- in terms of how such an exemplary conversation relates to the research design and process?
